![]() |
Elijah Abel - First black priesthood holder 1836 |
It's wonderful to have deep issues which challenge our faith!
And if you're struggling with this particular topic or know someone who is, this may come across as a non-sequitur statement to even make. I hope you'll let me explain a bit. I'm betting by the end, you'll understand and maybe even agree.
I've been there and walked this difficult priesthood ban road up and down. Spent hours and hours on it, reading different references & viewpoints, pondering and kicking the tires.
It paid off.
Which is beautiful because it's not the outcome I expected, ESPECIALLY when first facing this fire-breathing dragon. But what an awesome experience to have partnered with the heavens and come out the conqueror. I'm now convinced anyone can do this with any issue.
What I ended up with, is a stronger, deeper faith along with a larger view of how the gospel works and not the weakened version of hope and testimony which some Saints may experience.
Let's tackle this one together?
There are two basic tough questions, which must be answered.
Warning: These are pretty frank ~ but I find it best to not be afraid of such things.
1) How could Brigham Young, a prophet, have made such a grand error and lead the Church down a mistaken path on this issue? Aren't prophets supposed to never lead us astray? Don't they have direct contact? How can a prophet be so wrong and still be a true prophet?
2) How could God allow something so enormous to go wrong in His Church and not straighten it out much sooner? What about all of His children who were turned away from the truth because it obscured folks from recognizing the true Church? Where is the justice here?
The first question can be answered by understanding the false doctrine of infallibility. I've written about this before, but it was buried in a Joseph Fielding Smith lesson which may not be very searchable. So let's repeat part of it here and we'll also share the stellar comment a black LDS sister made after reading the same blog post.
*****
Addressing Question #1Lately, the Brethren in SLC have been so brave to publicly tackle a series of tough LDS history issues. They're located at
Gospel Topics on lds.org. The latest was posted a couple of days ago - the
Mountain Meadows Massacre. If you have been on this blog a while, you may have noticed it confronts difficult topics head on. I had to struggle mightily through some historical affairs in regards to the priesthood and hope to help a few other souls through them as well. Here we go:
This is in direct response to section 5 of this lesson (the last section of Joseph Fielding Smith, lesson 11).
Why cover this section so thoroughly ? Because it's probably the most imperative part of the lesson, especially given recent Church events. Second, I work for the LDS.org Response Team - answering questions to the world and feel strongly to address the issues which are thrown at us about the Priesthood more than any other. You may have these same questions yourself, or those questions may come up in class, or if you talk with those of other faiths much, you will definitely hear versions of these questions.
These next few paragraphs will probably not make it into anyone's lesson material - but they lay the groundwork here so you're ready for some of the difficult questions which will come up for quite a few of you.
This is to help you address the elephant in the room - which honestly would be so much more comfortable to pass over - and we have for years.
This quote from the last section made me swallow hard and prompted this second part of the lesson post:
"I think there is one thing which we should have exceedingly clear in our minds. Neither the President of the Church, nor the First Presidency, nor the united voice of the First Presidency and the Twelve will ever lead the Saints astray or send forth counsel to the world that is contrary to the mind and will of the Lord."I labored over this quote. How to reconcile it and how it can fit into our lives today. The rather large irony of including this quote with a lesson about the priesthood will occur to quite a few people.
Let me re-phrase Joseph Fielding Smith's statement a bit to something which is more in keeping with what the Brethren in SLC are trying so hard to accomplish in our current time - to undo the
false doctrine of infallibility. The doctrine of infallibility, believing the Church leaders can do no wrong or make mistakes in regards to the Church, has gotten us (collectively) into quite a bit of trouble. I'm not sure how it crept into our Mormon society to begin with, because the Bible doesn't support infallibility (more on this in a bit), nor does the Doctrine and Covenants nor the Book of Mormon. Joseph Smith definitely didn't support it. Thankfully, line upon line, precept upon precept, this inaccurate concept is tumbling down (gradually) within the culture of our Church. And none too soon.
Please don't misread me - I deeply love the prophets and apostles of our dispensation as in full out adore them. They have depth of understanding, wisdom, revelations, insights I couldn't even begin to aspire to.
They are also human - and have imperfect mortal moments
which some of us seem threatened over if they are ever mentioned or referred to.Try reading the quote again with a couple of minor changes and then we'll discuss them a bit:
"I think there is one thing which we should have exceedingly clear in our minds. Neither the President of the Church, nor the First Presidency, nor the united voice of the First Presidency and the Twelve will ever lead the Saints astray [through revelation]
or send forth [claims of revelation]
to the world that is contrary to the mind and will of the Lord."
Why the distinction with revelation? There is a difference between revelation given to our prophets (which becomes scripture and central doctrine) and their personal theories, opinions and mortal learning curves which sometimes become a part of our long-standing Church culture only to be unlearned later.
This is not to say their personal opinions, lectures and understandings aren't often spectacular and insightful. Not to mention many of their words are affirmed by the Holy Ghost in our hearts as great truths to hold on to. We learn deep, abiding concepts from studying the words and teachings of early leaders. Nonetheless, sometimes their personal understanding didn't include the complete picture and sometimes it was downright wrong. Lately,
the Church has been making a concerted effort to separate revelation and doctrine from stated personal theories and individual actions. And with good reason, some very notable, strong opinions of leaders from the past have proven to be influences of the culture or the beliefs of their day which have since come up false. We'll get to a couple of examples later in this post.
The LDS Church is unique in that we've faithfully recorded just about every lecture, every thought process, every learning curve and every public opinion ever made by any of the early leaders. Should we do the same in any other earthly institution - secular, educational, government, religion or otherwise - over the last 200 years, you would find plenty to point fingers at or smirk over. And people do point out some pretty off-the-wall statements from our LDS past, and members feel obligated at times to carry the load by defending and justifying.
Not any more. Consider this official Church statement about past church leader statements and the Journal of Discourses (which is a favorite source for anti-Mormon quotes and jabs).
"Not every statement made by a Church leader, past or present, necessarily constitutes doctrine. A single statement made by a single leader on a single occasion often represents a personal, though well-considered, opinion, but is not meant to be officially binding for the whole Church. With divine inspiration, the First Presidency (the prophet and his two counselors) and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles (the second-highest governing body of the Church) counsel together to establish doctrine that is consistently proclaimed in official Church publications. This doctrine resides in the four “standard works” of scripture (the Holy Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants and the Pearl of Great Price), official declarations and proclamations, and the Articles of Faith. Isolated statements are often taken out of context, leaving their original meaning distorted."(
May 4, 2007)
In short: We do NOT have to prove every speculative statement made or defend their honor as an inspired Church leader if their personal opinion fails over time. What matters is our established doctrine as published in our canon which come from actual revelations. This is what constitutes the core of our beliefs and our religion.
Here is the
official Latter-day Saint statement on the Journal of Discourses specifically:
"The Journal of Discourses is not an official publication of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It is a compilation of sermons and other materials from the early years of the Church, which were transcribed and then published. It includes practical advice as well as doctrinal discussion, some of which is speculative in nature and some of which is only of historical interest. ... Questions have been raised about the accuracy of some transcriptions. Modern technology and processes were not available for verifying the accuracy of transcriptions, and some significant mistakes have been documented. The Journal of Discourses includes interesting and insightful teachings by early Church leaders; however, by itself it is not an authoritative source of Church doctrine."There is not one soul nor organization in the history of this world who meets the imaginary benchmark of infallibility - never making a mistake or misstep or having to collectively learn line upon line as a group. Why we hold ourselves to such a benchmark of perfection or feel we have to answer to others when they hold the Church's leaders or events in Church history up to this benchmark is neither wise nor equitable -
but somehow we got hooked.Let's consider a couple of some of the greatest prophets we know from the Bible. First we have Moses who got himself in a whole lot of trouble with the Lord and was banned from entering the Promised Land. How? When the Children of Israel desperately needed water, he was instructed to speak to the rock in the Lord's name and power. It would have been a great visual aid to help solidify God (His power and His mercy) to the Children of Israel. Instead, Moses pulled an attitude, called them rebels, told them he was fetching the water and hit the rock with his stick. Unfortunately, what the easily superstitious Children of Israel learned from this great miracle, was Moses had a magic stick. The results did not go over well with the heavens. (
Numbers 20:8-11) Was Moses still a great prophet? Yes, very much so.
And we all know the painfully, poignant story of Peter repeatedly ditching and turning a back on Christ during the Savior's most trying moments of capture and mock trial. Until the "cock crew." After which Peter, when taking a good look at himself, "wept bitterly." (
Matthew 26:75) Peter was also the apostle who refused to preach the gospel to the Gentiles and felt it was for Jews only. It wasn't until after he had the same vision three times, that he finally relented (
Acts 11:1-18). Was Peter still a great apostle with many succinct and divine words? Absolutely, he is one of my favorites!
Another example of fallibility is included in this very lesson with the example of the Saints (Joseph Smith specifically) getting chastised for pushing off the Kirtland Temple.
"After the organization of the Church the Lord commanded His Saints that they build a house unto His name. The Saints hardly realized the importance of it, and they did not go to work at once to build that house, so the Lord rebuked them (
D&C 95:1–4).
And what about the 116 pages from Lehi we missed out on? Listen to what the Lord says directly to Joseph Smith - one of the greatest of the greats - about the lost manuscripts:
3 Remember, remember that it is not the work of God that is frustrated, but the work of men;4 For although a man may have many revelations, and have power to do many mighty works, yet if he boasts in his own strength, and sets at naught the counsels of God, and follows after the dictates of his own will and carnal desires, he must fall and incur the vengeance of a just God upon him.5 Behold, you have been entrusted with these things, but how strict were your commandments; and remember also the promises which were made to you, if you did not transgress them.6 And behold, how oft you have transgressed the commandments and the laws of God, and have gone on in the persuasions of men.7 For, behold, you should not have feared man more than God. Although men set at naught the counsels of God, and despise his words—8 Yet you should have been faithful; and he would have extended his arm and supported you against all the fiery darts of the adversary; and he would have been with you in every time of trouble.9 Behold, thou art Joseph, and thou wast chosen to do the work of the Lord, but because of transgression, if thou art not aware thou wilt fall.10 But remember, God is merciful; therefore, repent of that which thou hast done which is contrary to the commandment which I gave you, and thou art still chosen, and art again called to the work;11 Except thou do this, thou shalt be delivered up and become as other men, and have no more gift.Permit me to add an observation about Joseph Smith's character here. My respect for Joseph Smith increased several times over, because of this incident as recorded in Section 3.
What an extraordinary giant of a man to humbly admit, reveal and publish to the world one of his greatest failed moments as well as the humbling scolding he endured. What does that tell you about Joseph? The same goes for Moses, who wrote several of those early Bible books, he also publicizes to a nation and the world about falling on his face pretty hard. And Peter's experience was intensely personal, only he and the Savior knew about it - yet he disclosed it for all of us and let the story be known. These are the markings of wide and deep souls.
Contrast that to some leaders we've known who cannot admit they were ever wrong, or rarely apologize for mistakes?
Or anyone else we know who clings to their own aura of infallibility? We don't tend to have a lot of respect for such folks and they're typically hard to work with or be around. Nor do they come across as all that accomplished or spiritually deep over the course of time, do they?
How on earth did we let the illusion of infallibility shape our perceptions of what a man of God is, what a prophet is and what the True Church is?
Even Christ, while on the earth and personally leading the Church by the hand, had squabbling members, competition, steep learning curves and betrayal among his disciples. To think that it was ever to go perfectly or without mishap is to ignore our religious history as recorded from the beginning of the Bible onward as well as other scriptures right up to our present day!
Elder Uchtdorf sums this all up wonderfully (like he does so often):
"And, to be perfectly frank, there have been times when members or leaders in the Church have simply made mistakes. There may have been things said or done that were not in harmony with our values, principles, or doctrine.""I suppose the Church would be perfect only if it were run by perfect beings. God is perfect, and His doctrine is pure. But He works through us—His imperfect children—and imperfect people make mistakes.""In the title page of the Book of Mormon we read, “And now, if there are faults they are the mistakes of men; wherefore, condemn not the things of God, that ye may be found spotless at the judgment-seat of Christ.”"This is the way it has always been and will be until the perfect day when Christ Himself reigns personally upon the earth.""It is unfortunate that some have stumbled because of mistakes made by men. But in spite of this, the eternal truth of the restored gospel found in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is not tarnished, diminished, or destroyed." (General Conference - Oct 2013)
All of this to oust the elephant in the room!
In December of 2013 the Church put up something rather unusual and actually remarkable on their official Church website. They posted a topic page titled "
Race And The Priesthood" which explains the ban on blacks getting the priesthood, why it was justified, how it was removed and
why it was incorrect to begin with - did you get that last part?
For some of you this is going to be pretty huge. I know I had to struggle and work through this, so I certainly won't find fault if you do too.
Salt Lake thankfully, wonderfully un-validates the priesthood ban for blacks with the following statement from that same article:
"Today, the Church disavows the theories advanced in the past that black skin is a sign of divine disfavor or curse, or that it reflects actions in a premortal life; that mixed-race marriages are a sin; or that blacks or people of any other race or ethnicity are inferior in any way to anyone else. Church leaders today unequivocally condemn all racism, past and present, in any form."disavow: deny any responsibility or support for, disclaim, disown, wash one's hands of, repudiate, reject, renounce
When blacks and the priesthood became a topic on our local stake sisters email thread earlier this year- I enthusiastically shared the links to this Church web page and other pages with the comment - "so grateful the Church is admitting this was a mistake."
There was some backlash for that statement.
The idea of anyone making a mistake in SLC was terribly threatening for several. They challenged back and said things like "The Church doesn't make mistakes." "It doesn't say it was a 'mistake'..." etc. I felt it best not to respond at the time.
Infallibility is ingrained in our Church culture and thinking. It may take a while to undo.
Brigham Young instituted, explained and maintained the withholding of the priesthood from blacks based on Cain's curse (among other pre-mortal theories) - which by the way, was the prevalent teaching of the day among all Northern American and Western European churches. Brigham Young was raised with this belief which was used to justify slavery. He makes some pretty ignorant, uncomfortable statements about blacks which anti-mormons have a heyday with. With good reason - there is no justification for them. I can't even bring myself to quote them here.
Please recall, the best and the most noble have their blundering, fall-on-their-face moments. Perhaps these moments are made even bigger because prophets and apostles are highly public figures and all eyes are on them.
The expectation of perfection, is a hard, unattainable experience for any mortal - even a prophet. And banning blacks from the priesthood was Brigham Young's cock crowing (Peter), magic stick (Moses), lost manuscript (Joseph) moment.
To be fair - Brigham Young never claimed any of his opinions about blacks, Cain's curse or the priesthood ban as direct revelation to him from God. Nor did it ever make it into any of our official canon and scripture as a revelation given. Instead, he reinforced it on his authority as a prophet. And then subsequent leaders carried it on because of tradition.
Brigham Young's greatest failing was he bought into the prejudice of his time and didn't question it. And it's been our mutual failing for a long time.To also be fair - Brigham Young was a wonderful, inspired leader - the modern Moses of our time. He carved a last-dispensation version of the Promised Land out of almost nothingness. I have a strong testimony of the divinity of his calling and he was absolutely a prophet of God. His accomplishments, his successes, his spiritual insights, his leadership, and his visions are amazing. I love studying many of his lectures and understandings. It is wise to remember here that even the most noble and great ones have their Achilles' heel - as in every single one. And Brigham certainly had to pay the piper for his. Claiming perfection and infallibility is not the pattern we've ever had from the prophets and the scriptures of the Bible - and we're wise not to implement them for our time either.
We probably should have known something was up because Joseph Smith ordained black members, sent them on missions and called them to leadership positions. For some reason, this is not as well known. If all the claims Brigham Young put forth were true, why would Joseph Smith have opened the door to black members from the beginning?
Which leads to a great thought from Elder Bednar:
“As you endeavor to increase in learning, please remember that the doctrines and principles of the restored gospel should be considered in their totality. In other words, attempting to understand a doctrine or principle by examining a single scripture or prophetic statement in isolation from all else that has been revealed on the subject is generally misguided. True doctrines and principles are emphasized repeatedly in the standard works, by the prophets and apostles, and through the illuminating and confirming power of the Holy Ghost.” (from the introduction in his book "Increase In Learning)
This last quote ties into the Church statement made earlier - let me requote the first two sentences:
"Not every statement made by a Church leader, past or present, necessarily constitutes doctrine. A single statement made by a single leader on a single occasion often represents a personal, though well-considered, opinion, but is not meant to be officially binding for the whole Church."The Lord himself explains there are mistakes among the Church leadership and that we are all a work in progress collectively. Line upon line - precept upon precept - it goes with the territory of being from a mortal world:
24 Behold, I am God and have spoken it; these commandments are of me, and were given unto my servants in their weakness (Joseph Smith and other leaders referred to specifically in prior verses)
, after the manner of their language, that they might come to understanding.25 And inasmuch as they erred it might be made known;26 And inasmuch as they sought wisdom they might be instructed;27 And inasmuch as they sinned they might be chastened, that they might repent;28 And inasmuch as they were humble they might be made strong, and blessed from on high, and receive knowledge from time to time. (
D&C 1:24-28)
Mistakes and progression right up through the top of church leadership are part of the earthly plan. We learn better when we have to stumble through it ourselves rather than having everything handed to us.
Yet, despite our mortal-ness, Jesus is still the Christ and the Church is still His.
Here are some of the more important things to remember about our membership in Christ's church:
Is the Savior, His Spirit and His saving grace found here? Yes.
Is the power of the Sacrament found here? Yes.
Are the Holy Ghost and the other saving ordinances found here? Yes.
Will we get there (Celestial Kingdom)? Yes.
Will there be missteps in the Church along the way? Yes.
Will you be held personally accountable for those Church-wide learning curves? No.
Regardless, our assignment is to follow the prophet, move the Kingdom of God forward and put our shoulder to the wheel. When mistakes happen, they are part of our collective learning process and how we roll...line upon line, precept upon precept.
Like Christ said in Section 3 above -
"Remember, remember that it is not the work of God that is frustrated, but the work of men..." We investigate and learn from our errors and move forward. Thankfully that's an upward movement! I love all the goodness and enlightenment we do have - it's an extraordinary amount and I undoubtedly have a long ways to go to absorb it all. We all have ample room for growth and reaching. I really love this restored gospel - even along with the occasional mortal fail.
Remarks by Keisha Smith, a black LDS member:
"Shawnie... I write this with tears in my eyes- as a black woman who knows the truth of the restored gospel with all that I am, to have these issues addressed so directly and in such a forthright manner is beautiful. Since it became known by friends and family, black and white I was studying and then cnverting the church, many have used these exampes as to why the church isn't true. After 5 years I no lnger feel the need to debate or argue. I know what I know... The gospel has been restored, the church is true and while the people in it mnay not be perfect, his gospel and plan is! Thank you!"*****
Addressing Question #2This question has also been covered on this blog, but it too was buried in a lesson post (Ezra Taft Benson #2) and the prompting has come several times to put this material all together in one place and give it a blog post title people could search and find.
So here comes another re-post. I hope you'll forgive me if you've read it before (and I'm thrilled to have you here always!), however a lot of people aren't here to read the lesson helps and this is for them.
******
President Ezra Taft Benson's opening statement gives us a peek inside this man's spiritual giant-ness. Prayer is what he founded his life on, including being an apostle and a prophet:
“All through my life the counsel to depend on prayer has been prized above almost any other advice I have received,” said President Ezra Taft Benson. “It has become an integral part of me, an anchor, a constant source of strength, and the basis for my knowledge of things divine.""..and the basis for my knowledge of things divine." Wow.
President Benson touches on something so important here, I'd like to spend a couple of moments on it.
If I could compare President Benson's quote to my own experience ~ prayer is how I increase my gospel understanding line upon line, and piece by piece. I have found if there comes a gospel concept which I don't understand or don't feel comfortable with, or if there is something from church history which comes across as awkward or questionable to me ~ if I then kneel in prayer and ask about it, the answer eventually comes.
In my mind's eye, I visualize laying the question or any life issue on the alter at His feet with the trust I'll run into the answer somewhere in a way which is very satisfactory to me. Either my eyes are opened and I see the issue from different angles which then makes more sense, or it is put into a more balanced perspective for me and I understand what is caused by frail mortal learning curves and what is from the divine. Sometimes the answer comes from something I read, sometimes from something someone says and sometimes it will just come all at once on its own and literally drops into place in my head. Having prayers answered has happened hundreds of times now. I can count on it.
I love how Ezra Taft Benson references this same process in the above quote and again when he cites a poem from childhood. By the way, this is the best poem ever! My kids are learning it for FHE this coming Monday. I'll probably give it to them ahead of time and whoever can cite it will get a giant chocolate bar. If there is anything I would want my children to understand about prayer, it would be this:
I know not by what methods rare,
But this I know, God answers prayer.
I know that He has given His Word,
Which tells me prayer is always heard,
And will be answered, soon or late.
And so I pray and calmly wait.
I know not if the blessing sought
Will come in just the way I thought;
But leave my prayers with Him alone,
Whose will is wiser than my own,
Assured that He will grant my quest,
Or send some answer far more blest.
Let me give a very personal example of how it worked for me recently. This whole issue with the black priesthood ban and the Church now coming out and saying Brigham Young made an error. (If this is a surprise for you,
sorry about that, but you can
read about it here on the Church's website.)
I'm ok with prophets making errors and having learning curves. Such things are recorded from the beginning of time and the Bible itself isn't bashful about the topic ~ Joseph Smith wasn't bashful about his own mistakes, so discovering a modern prophet's error or an apostle's mistake in and of itself doesn't rattle me. I've long since learned they increase line upon line and precept upon precept too, just generally way ahead of most of us. And God's designated spokesman is His designated spokesman. When prophets do have revelations, it's recorded as canon (the four standard works) and these are the foundation of our faith, and not their personal understanding. (Even though it mostly included great wisdom and insight, it sometimes included learning curves and imperfect understanding.)
Instead of the possibility of a prophet failing, what got to me was all the lost opportunity this priesthood ban mistake caused. How many souls have been turned away or turned off because of the black priesthood ban or couldn't recognize the true church because of it? How many generations lost out on the blessing of providence and increase because they didn't have the gospel passed down through their ranks, one generation improving on the next? How different the quality of life could have been for so many! And there I was asking the typical atheist's question, "How could God let this happen?" "If this is His inspired Church, how could He let such a thing take place?" It seemed so unfair and counter-productive.
Then last week as my family read D&C 137, the answer came like the rushing wind. You know, it does seem like when we ponder hard over something, the answer comes in an equally exulting way.
Here are the verses:
2 I saw the transcendent beauty of the gate through which the heirs of that [celestial] kingdom will enter, which was like unto circling flames of fire;3 Also the blazing throne of God, whereon was seated the Father and the Son.4 I saw the beautiful streets of that kingdom, which had the appearance of being paved with gold.5 I saw Father Adam and Abraham; and my father and my mother; my brother Alvin, that has long since slept;6 And marveled how it was that he had obtained an inheritance in that kingdom, seeing that he had departed this life before the Lord had set his hand to gather Israel the second time, and had not been baptized for the remission of sins.7 Thus came the voice of the Lord unto me, saying: All who have died without a knowledge of this gospel, who would have received it if they had been permitted to tarry, shall be heirs of the celestial kingdom of God;8 Also all that shall die henceforth without a knowledge of it, who would have received it with all their hearts, shall be heirs of that kingdom;
9 For I, the Lord, will judge all men according to their works, according to the desire of their hearts.It came to me hard and strong. I was doing what most of this world does. We (collectively) judge a thing by our view of mortal life being the end-all, with a sense of imposed finite borders ~ the beginning of earth life and the end of earth life. The belief that all justice and mercy must take place within a person's life span or the cause is lost or a failure.
Instead, we have a God who knew we mortals, even with the best of intentions, would mess things up. He chose to let us progress, stumble through our learning curves and be in charge of Church leadership and administration anyway rather than set up a perfect rule by heavenly beings with no mistakes. Why? Because the stumbling process would prepare and develop us further over the long run. And also because we learn lessons much deeper from opposition and from mistakes.
Which means there are many things which will be put right, balanced and answered to on the other side of the veil. Christ has promised us He will dry all tears.
The verses above reminded me death is not the "time's up" a lot of us tend to think.The gospel will be presented to all in its whole form and its perfect light. Everyone will have a chance to see it, know it and decide whether to embrace it or not. In God's endless mercy and love, nothing can be denied to any of His children, including a complete view of the gospel plan and an invitation to a perfect knowledge of the way to salvation. Whomever was blinded by others on earth, or denied a chance to hear it and would have truly embraced the Gospel otherwise, will be unblinded in the next realm.
There are safeguards in place to ensure all of our brothers and sisters get their chance to be adopted into the House of Israel. I already knew this about all those folks from the medieval times (dark ages), when the gospel was no where to be found for anyone before the restoration.
Yet somehow I needed help to see it applied here too.Now, a question which was once so troubling, no longer is an issue. I can trust God. His intentions are perfect, and pure. And I do have to wonder if maybe Brigham Young isn't making a lot of effort to clear things up with quite a few folks, and eating some humble crow. Knowing his character, it wouldn't surprise me at all. But this is sheer indulgence in speculation.
I am so grateful for this glimpse of understanding about an important learning curve in our collective Church history and the peace it brought to me. And it started with taking the matter to the Lord in prayer and laying it on the altar.
*****
Thank you so much for sharing these thoughts and time with me on this issue. I wish you well and hope you have the peace, confidence and strength to always work through tough questions. Coming out the other end of them is a marvelous experience!
Timshel.